Nabble has removed Mailing-list integration.
Posts created here DO NOT GET SENT TO THE MAILING LIST.
Mailing-list emails DO NOT GET POSTED TO THE FORUM.
So basically the Forum is now out of date, we are looking into migrating the history.
I've mentioned elsewhere on this Forum that I have been working on a simple
Python program that enables me to create OpenSCAD code without having to type all the syntactical stuff. I think the program has now advanced far enough to make it public for anyone that might be interested. I do appreciate that it will probably be more attractive for the occasional OpenSCAD user as compared to those who are a great deal more expert with OpenSCAD than I am. <http://forum.openscad.org/file/t2631/GetStartedBoth.png> This short Youtube video should give you a flavour of how ClikScad is used. The video is intended for illustration rather than education. https://youtu.be/q1Sd0Fuppuw The Python code and the documentation can be downloaded from Google Drive. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1uBpil6TeYyaar_0l8Zm_17UvE-EOTza7?usp=sharing ...R -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
Have you heard about https://graphscad.blogspot.com/ ?
On 10/12/19, Robin2 <[hidden email]> wrote: > I've mentioned elsewhere on this Forum that I have been working on a simple > Python program that enables me to create OpenSCAD code without having to > type all the syntactical stuff. > > I think the program has now advanced far enough to make it public for > anyone > that might be interested. I do appreciate that it will probably be more > attractive for the occasional OpenSCAD user as compared to those who are a > great deal more expert with OpenSCAD than I am. > > <http://forum.openscad.org/file/t2631/GetStartedBoth.png> > > This short Youtube video should give you a flavour of how ClikScad is used. > The video is intended for illustration rather than education. > https://youtu.be/q1Sd0Fuppuw > > The Python code and the documentation can be downloaded from Google Drive. > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1uBpil6TeYyaar_0l8Zm_17UvE-EOTza7?usp=sharing > > ...R > > > > -- > Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org > _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
tobject wrote
> Have you heard about https://graphscad.blogspot.com/ ? Yes. It's mentioned in my PDFs ...R -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
In reply to this post by Robin2
On 12.10.19 17:01, Robin2 wrote:
> The Python code and the documentation can be downloaded from Google Drive. Would you consider placing the code on Github or Gitlab (or something along these lines)? I'm interested in exploring this code further, but collaboration by way of Google Drive is … painful. -- -- Matthias Urlichs _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
OpenSCAD mailing list wrote
> Would you consider placing the code on Github or Gitlab (or something > along these lines)? I did but it's just too much trouble for me. It would mean completely changing the way I work. Feel free to put it on Github yourself if you wish. ...R -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
In reply to this post by Robin2
I don't know if this is the proper place for it, but since it isn't on
github, I can't open an issue or ask questions there. I ran clikscad.py, got the "listening" message, then opened OpenSCAD and loaded GetStarted.scad, then in the ClikSCAD window on the browser, I loaded GetStarted.clik Nothing showed up in my OpenSCAD window. I tried rendering, and it showed up, but when I made changes, nothing happened to anything in the OpenSCAD window. -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
Administrator
|
I haven't used it but I presume it needs Auto-reload&Preview set.
----- Admin - email* me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid... * click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me. Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above. The TPP is no simple “trade agreement.” Fight it! http://www.ourfairdeal.org/ time is running out! -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
OpenSCAD Admin - email* me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid...
* on the Forum, click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me. Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above. |
MichaelAtOz wrote
> I haven't used it but I presume it needs Auto-reload&Preview set. Yes - sorry - I had assumed that would be second nature for Openscad folks. ...R -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
This post was updated on .
In reply to this post by lar3ry
lar3ry wrote
> I don't know if this is the proper place for it, but since it isn't on > github, I can't open an issue or ask questions there. I have been assuming that people will comment here as it is essentially an Openscad thing You need to select Design/Auto-reload and preview - I have had that set for so long I assumed it was the default. Thanks for pointing this out, and sorry you had the trouble. I have updated the instructions. ...R -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list Discuss@lists.openscad.org http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
In reply to this post by Robin2
I've been looking at this sort of thing for a while now.
- https://graphscad.blogspot.com/ --- this was neat in that it was a desktop app, but the OpenSCAD code was much modified and I found that confusing and problematic - https://github.com/studiotc/NodeGraphInterface --- I have an irrational mislike of Java, and I found setting up variables in this clunky - https://www.blockscad3d.com/editor/# --- I've been using this quite a bit, and greatly like it I'd like to use OpenJSCAD, but I keep running into instances where code doesn't seem to work. Examples of my using BlockSCAD: - https://community.carbide3d.com/t/fitted-box-design-generator-underway/13437/12 - https://community.carbide3d.com/t/design-into-3d-boxes-magazine-storage/16238/2 (there's some more on my GitHub) I'd really like to see something which: - had both a desktop and web version - had robust support for the customizer (blockscad requires one finish up coding it in OpenSCAD) - allowed one to put projects up on a site where others could access them I have a URL I'd like to use for that --- designinto3d.com but I'm kind of mystified by the whole web server hosting thing. Even better would be if the server could run TeX/LaTeX and serve up files thusly generated. William -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
OpenSCAD mailing list-2 wrote
> I'd really like to see something which: > > - had both a desktop and web version, Who is going to create it? I reckon the first thing that is needed is for the OpenSCAD folks to acknowledge that a GUI front-end would be "a good idea". At the moment there seems to be no "official" interest. (By the way I don't mean that the OpenSCAD folks should write the program - just that they would support it) > - had robust support for the customizer (blockscad requires one finish up > coding it in OpenSCAD) I recently tried the customizer briefly and I was grossly under-whelmed - I will not repeat the experience. It seems to me altogether the wrong solution to simplification (or whatever it is trying to solve) - it certainly did not simplify anything for me. > - allowed one to put projects up on a site where others could access them > > William People can do that now. There are lots of projects on Thingiverse and any Cloud storage can make a file publicly available. There is nothing to prevent someone creating a design with my ClikScad and posting that on the Cloud somewhere. ...R -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
IMHO, Openscad as it is works fine. Having used most major CAD systems for many years, for my own projects and for teaching, openscad is my preference.
My students learn a lot more by having to think about describing their geometries with “code” than pointing and clicking. It is also important for them for understanding the differences between a programming language and a descriptive language. /mikael University of Limerick, Ireland ------------------------------ Sent from a mobile device. > On 24 Oct 2019, at 21:28, "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > OpenSCAD mailing list-2 wrote >> I'd really like to see something which: >> >> - had both a desktop and web version, > > Who is going to create it? I reckon the first thing that is needed is for > the OpenSCAD folks to acknowledge that a GUI front-end would be "a good > idea". At the moment there seems to be no "official" interest. (By the way I > don't mean that the OpenSCAD folks should write the program - just that they > would support it) > > >> - had robust support for the customizer (blockscad requires one finish up >> coding it in OpenSCAD) > > I recently tried the customizer briefly and I was grossly under-whelmed - I > will not repeat the experience. It seems to me altogether the wrong solution > to simplification (or whatever it is trying to solve) - it certainly did not > simplify anything for me. > > >> - allowed one to put projects up on a site where others could access them >> >> William > > People can do that now. There are lots of projects on Thingiverse and any > Cloud storage can make a file publicly available. There is nothing to > prevent someone creating a design with my ClikScad and posting that on the > Cloud somewhere. > > > ...R > > > > -- > Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
In reply to this post by Robin2
On 24.10.19 22:38, Robin2 wrote:
> Who is going to create it? I reckon the first thing > that is needed is for the OpenSCAD folks to acknowledge > that a GUI front-end would be "a good idea". At the moment > there seems to be no "official" interest. (By the way I > don't mean that the OpenSCAD folks should write the > program - just that they would support it) Who would that be ("the OpenSCAD folks")? And what would "support it" mean? ciao, Torsten. _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
-- Torsten
|
In reply to this post by Robin2
On 10/24/2019 1:38 PM, Robin2 wrote:
I recently tried the customizer briefly and I was grossly under-whelmed - I will not repeat the experience. It seems to me altogether the wrong solution to simplification (or whatever it is trying to solve) - it certainly did not simplify anything for me. Were you trying it as a model designer, or as a model consumer wanting to customize somebody else's design? It isn't intended to make things easier for the model designer. If anything, it makes things more complex. It's intended for a consumer who wants a box that somebody else designed, but wants it in *these* dimensions, with *these* options. This (hypothetical?) user doesn't want to see OpenSCAD or make significant changes to the design, just pick options within the scope laid out by the designer. For instance: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:421886 (Doesn't seem to work in Firefox, but seems to work in Edge.) _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
In reply to this post by Robin2
It's frustrating to me that OpenJSCAD does have both a desktop and web
version, but doesn't work for me. The customizer affords at least a basic interface for parametric design, and for naïve users to customize designs. Things which I wish were possible in it: - unit conversion of customizer values when changing units --- so a design which has a thickness of 1" would have a thicknes of 25.4mm when switched from inches to mm - selectively hide/show elements - additional options for formatting the customizer window The thing which is missing from Thingiverse and other project sharing sites is integration --- I want folks to be able to customize a design in 3D using OpenSCAD, then use Tool Path Language (tplang), or lualatex and metapost, or some other tool to generate cut files. Imagine if one could use: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3575705 and then get the .c2d file from: http://chaunax.github.io/projects/twhl-box/twhl.html without having to enter the values twice. William -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
In reply to this post by tp3
tp3 wrote
> Who would that be ("the OpenSCAD folks")? > > And what would "support it" mean? I don't know their names but I presume there are some people who act as the "guardian" of the OpenSCAD project - for example in the way that Linus Torvalds does for Linux. The people who decide what goes into the next release and what doesn't. All I mean by "support" is a statement of encouragement - "We believe XXX would be a useful addition to OpenSCAD and we think it should have these general features [or should not have these features]" And maybe "we will bundle it with (or link to it from) OpenSCAD wen it is sufficiently complete" ...R -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
In reply to this post by JordanBrown
JordanBrown wrote
> Were you trying it as a model designer, or as a model consumer wanting > to customize somebody else's design? > > It isn't intended to make things easier for the model designer. If > anything, it makes things more complex. > > It's intended for a consumer who wants a box that somebody else > designed, but wants it in *these* dimensions, with *these* options. I was looking at it as a designer because IIRC someone referred me to it as an alternative to my proposed GUI. From what you say I can see how it can allow a designer to turn his creations into a "consumer item" - and I have no quibble with that. My interest is in creating a simpler interface for newbie designers. ...R -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
Not sure how a graphical representation is any simpler than text. It is exactly the same logical construction expressed in a different format. Do people really struggle much with syntax? The hard part is how to decompose and object into CSG operations and the trigonometry. Using text is a major benefit of OpenSCAD because it can be pasted into emails and checked into source control. It is also fairly concise. I imagine the graphical representation of my typical designs would be an enormous tree. On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 09:27, Robin2 <[hidden email]> wrote: JordanBrown wrote _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
In reply to this post by Robin2
Using the customizer forces one to use variables, and think about the model in those terms, which I believe helps.
The added complexity is worth it, though it would be nicer if it were more hierarchical.
William
_______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
In reply to this post by nophead
nophead wrote
> Not sure how a graphical representation is any simpler than text. It is > exactly the same logical construction expressed in a different format. I think you misunderstand what I have in mind. Have you had a look at my very short video https://youtu.be/q1Sd0Fuppuw <https://youtu.be/q1Sd0Fuppuw> I have no plan to produce a graphical representation of a design - the output of my program is regular OpenSCAD code. What I do think would be a great value is a system that eliminates the need to do all the typing that is currently an inherent part of OpenSCAD. In fact yesterday and today I have been using my ClikScad to design a part that I want to 3D print and (while I can see room for improvement in ClikScad) there is no way that I will go back to typing OpenSCAD code by hand. ...R -- Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/ _______________________________________________ OpenSCAD mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |