OpenSCAD 2021.01 released

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
tp3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

OpenSCAD 2021.01 released

tp3
Hi!

Some people may have seen it already, the release of
OpenSCAD 2021.01 happened a couple of days ago.

Here's finally the full announcement including the list
of changes:

https://www.openscad.org/news.html#20210131

All details on github:

https://github.com/openscad/openscad/releases/tag/openscad-2021.01

ciao,
  Torsten.

_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
-- Torsten
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenSCAD 2021.01 released

MichaelAtOz
Administrator
How about we ask for general issues here first? [he says
pessimistically...wanting to guide the community]

I'll be mentioning an export filename regression, after my sleep roster...





-----
OpenSCAD Admin - email* me if you need anything,  or if I've done something stupid...

* on the Forum, click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me.

Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.

--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/

_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
OpenSCAD Admin - email* me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid...
* on the Forum, click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me.

Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain;
to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work.
Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenSCAD 2021.01 released

OpenSCAD mailing list-2
Where should we report suggestions or test files?

I tend to define my files as a series of modules, with a set of tests which determine what gets modeled where, so the line #s which are pulled up are all from that testing block, not to the module in question (which would be preferable):

Pointing to the Sides module or the line it is called from (355), rather than line 342 where the overall test is would be more helpful --- the presence of the other instances makes it seem as though this could be improved:

Capture.PNG

William



-----Original Message-----
From: MichaelAtOz <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Sun, Feb 7, 2021 8:47 am
Subject: Re: [OpenSCAD] OpenSCAD 2021.01 released

How about we ask for general issues here first? [he says
pessimistically...wanting to guide the community]

I'll be mentioning an export filename regression, after my sleep roster...





-----
OpenSCAD Admin - email* me if you need anything,  or if I've done something stupid...

* on the Forum, click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me.

Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.

--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/


_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

=?utf-8?B?Rm9sZGluZyBTdG9vbC5zY2Fk?= (12K) Download Attachment
dpa
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenSCAD 2021.01 released

dpa
In reply to this post by MichaelAtOz
big THANK YOU
to you and everyone who participated in the new version!

a new version of OpenSCAD is always a bit like christmas for me <3

Am So., 7. Feb. 2021 um 14:48 Uhr schrieb MichaelAtOz <[hidden email]>:
How about we ask for general issues here first? [he says
pessimistically...wanting to guide the community]

I'll be mentioning an export filename regression, after my sleep roster...





-----
OpenSCAD Admin - email* me if you need anything,  or if I've done something stupid...

* on the Forum, click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me.

Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.

--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/

_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenSCAD 2021.01 released

Troberg
In reply to this post by tp3
Tiny bug: In the customizer, when you have a slider, if you drag the slider,
it correctly renders the image, but if you click in the slider to step the
value, it won't. If I press F5 after clicking in the slider, it goes back to
the pre-click value.



--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/

_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
tp3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenSCAD 2021.01 released

tp3
In reply to this post by OpenSCAD mailing list-2
On 07.02.21 14:59, William F. Adams via Discuss wrote:
> Where should we report suggestions or test files?

Those should go to github once they are clear enough
to describe. That means a good explanation of what would
be expected from user side so anyone can understand the
request just by reading the posted issue.

See also:
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/FAQ#Reporting_bugs,_Requesting_features

ciao,
  Torsten.

_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
-- Torsten
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenSCAD 2021.01 released

nophead
I have already raised a github issue that the customiser slider is broken. I am surprised the release was made before addressing that regression.

On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 15:11, Torsten Paul <[hidden email]> wrote:
On 07.02.21 14:59, William F. Adams via Discuss wrote:
> Where should we report suggestions or test files?

Those should go to github once they are clear enough
to describe. That means a good explanation of what would
be expected from user side so anyone can understand the
request just by reading the posted issue.

See also:
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/FAQ#Reporting_bugs,_Requesting_features

ciao,
  Torsten.

_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenSCAD 2021.01 released

MichaelAtOz
Administrator
In reply to this post by OpenSCAD mailing list-2
OpenSCAD mailing list-2 wrote
> Where should we report suggestions or test files?
> I tend to define my files as a series of modules, with a set of tests
> which determine what gets modeled where, so the line #s which are pulled
> up are all from that testing block, not to the module in question (which
> would be preferable):
> Pointing to the Sides module or the line it is called from (355), rather
> than line 342 where the overall test is would be more helpful --- the
> presence of the other instances makes it seem as though this could be
> improved:

I think the issue is that projection() extracts a slice of geometry (of
potentially many sub-bits), it would be difficult to tag particular sections
of the projection with the (potentially many) parts that contributed to its
output.
I haven't tried, but I expect minkowski() will have the same issue.



-----
OpenSCAD Admin - email* me if you need anything,  or if I've done something stupid...

* on the Forum, click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me.

Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain; to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work. Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.

--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/

_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
OpenSCAD Admin - email* me if you need anything, or if I've done something stupid...
* on the Forum, click on my MichaelAtOz label, there is a link to email me.

Unless specifically shown otherwise above, my contribution is in the Public Domain;
to the extent possible under law, I have waived all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this work.
Obviously inclusion of works of previous authors is not included in the above.