Beziers in BOSL2 Library

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Beziers in BOSL2 Library

jon_bondy
I have some time on my hands <sick grin> so I started playing around
with the BOSL2 Library.  The documentation is enticing, but I've had a
lot of errors running some of the examples for Bezier paths.  Anyone
been able to get these examples to work, or know of work arounds or
patches for problems with trace_polyline?



_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Beziers in BOSL2 Library

RevarBat
The issue with trace_polyline() got introduced recently when moving some code between modules.  Fixed now.
The hazards of an alpha-stage library. The chance to rewrite without worrying about backwards compatibility has made for much more elegant code than old BOSL1, but it's not quite done yet.

- Revar


> On Apr 10, 2020, at 6:25 AM, jon <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I have some time on my hands <sick grin> so I started playing around with the BOSL2 Library.  The documentation is enticing, but I've had a lot of errors running some of the examples for Bezier paths.  Anyone been able to get these examples to work, or know of work arounds or patches for problems with trace_polyline?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSCAD mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org


_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Beziers in BOSL2 Library

jon_bondy
Revar:

Thanks for your rapid attention to my bug reports.  Do you have a suite
of code that you run for validation before you push out to the git?

Jon

On 4/10/2020 4:05 PM, Revar Desmera wrote:
> The issue with trace_polyline() got introduced recently when moving some code between modules.  Fixed now.
> The hazards of an alpha-stage library. The chance to rewrite without worrying about backwards compatibility has made for much more elegant code than old BOSL1, but it's not quite done yet.
>
> - Revar

_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org